ClickCease
EN

Reasons for Using Circular-Motion Conventional and 3-Shaft Controlled Elliptical Vibrating Screens as the Main Distribution Screen

Reasons for Using Circular-Motion Conventional and 3-Shaft Controlled Elliptical Vibrating Screens as the Main Distribution Screen

Vibration Patterns of Screens

Circular-motion vibrating screens use a circular movement for screening. Gravity is needed for the material to advance over the screen mesh. For this reason, these screens are designed with an inclination. As the material particle advances over the screen panel, it makes a tumbling motion. This motion prevents the particle from becoming lodged (pegging) in the screen aperture and enables smaller particles to be screened.

Linear-motion horizontal (or very low-incline) screens use a back-and-forth movement at a positive angle to the vertical. The screen panel lifts the particle and causes it to fall at a point further along. This motion enables the material particle to advance over the screen panel. Because the screen is horizontal, the material particle falling in the vertical direction uses the entire screen aperture for screening. The screening of the undersize material is thus made easier.

Oval-motion vibrating screens, on the other hand, combine the rotating feature of circular-motion vibrating screens with the feature of using the entire screen aperture of linear-motion vibrating screens. Thus their screening efficiency and screening capacity are higher than those of circular- and linear-motion vibrating screens of the same size.


Figure 1. Vibration patterns in vibrating screens
Figure 1. Vibration patterns in vibrating screens

Reasons for Preferring Oval-Motion Vibrating Screens

  • High capacity
  • The controllability of the vibration parameters
  • A robust and long-lasting structure

are the most important reasons for preferring oval-motion controlled vibrating screens.

High Capacity

The capacity formula for vibrating screens is as follows. This formulaVSMA (the American Vibrating Screen Manufacturers Association) formula.

A = B * S * D * V * H * T * K * Y * P * O * W * F

A:The unit screening capacity of the screen,TPH/ft²

The factors used in this formula:

B:Basic capacity,TPH/ft²— Graph 1

S:Inclination factor — Graph 2

D:Screen deck position factor — Graph 3

V:Oversize material ratio factor — Graph 4

H:Half-size factor of the screen aperture — Graph 5

T:Screen aperture shape factor — Graph 6

K:Material condition factor — Graph 7

Y:Washing factor — Graph 8

P:Material shape factor — Graph 9

W:Weight factor — Graph 10

O:Open area factor — Graph 11

F:Screen efficiency factor — Graph 12

Graph 1. B – Basic capacity values TPH/ft²
Graph 1. B – Basic capacity values TPH/ft²

Graph 2. S – Screen inclination factor
Graph 2. S – Screen inclination factor

Graph 3. D – Screen deck position factor
Graph 3. D – Screen deck position factor

Graph 4. V – Oversize material ratio factor
Graph 4. V – Oversize material ratio factor

Graph 5. H – Half-size factor of the screen aperture
Graph 5. H – Half-size factor of the screen aperture

Graph 6. T – Screen aperture shape factor
Graph 6. T – Screen aperture shape factor

Graph 7. K – Material condition factor
Graph 7. K – Material condition factor

Graph 8. Y – Washing factor
Graph 8. Y – Washing factor

Graph 9. P – Material shape factor
Graph 9. P – Material shape factor

Graph 10. O – Open area factor
Graph 10. O – Open area factor

Graph 11. W – Weight factor
Graph 11. W – Weight factor

Graph 12. F – Screen efficiency factor
Graph 12. F – Screen efficiency factor

Recently, especially after 3-shaft oval-motion vibrating screens came into use, the VSMA formula has been modified as follows.

A = B * S * D * V * H * T * K * Y * P * O * W * F * T Y P * S T R * T I M * R P M * N E A * B E D

TYP:Vibration stroke type factor — Graph 13

STR:Stroke length factor — Graph 14

TIM: Vibration angle factor — Graph 15

RPM: Vibration speed factor — Graph 16

NEA:Near-size factor — Graph 17

BED:Material bed thickness factor — Graph 18

These factors are taken from the following graphs.

Graph 13. TYP – Vibration stroke type factor
Graph 13. TYP – Vibration stroke type factor

Graph 14. STR – Stroke length factor
Graph 14. STR – Stroke length factor

Graph 15. TIM – Vibration angle factor
Graph 15. TIM – Vibration angle factor

Graph 16. RPM – Vibration speed factor (for oval- and linear-motion vibrating screens)
Graph 16. RPM – Vibration speed factor (for oval- and linear-motion vibrating screens)

Graph 17. NEA – Near-size factor
Graph 17. NEA – Near-size factor

Graph 18. BED – Material bed thickness factor
Graph 18. BED – Material bed thickness factor

Figure 2. The capacity difference of a horizontal screen compared with an inclined screen of the same size
Figure 2. The capacity difference of a horizontal screen compared with an inclined screen of the same size

The most important of these factors is the TYP vibration-pattern factor.

Graph 13 shows us the TYP factors. As can be seen from this, in oval-motion vibrating screens, solely because of the vibration pattern,%12 there is a capacity increase.

In addition, Figure 2 explains the additional capacity that arises because the screen operates horizontally. We also see this from the S – Screen inclination factor shown in Graph 2. As can be seen in this graph, in a horizontal screen compared with an inclined screen, %10 a capacity increase is achieved.

If we take the effect of all these factors into account, the capacity of an oval-motion screen is about 30% higher than that of an inclined, circular-motion screen of the same size.

The Controllability of the Vibration Parameters

In 3-shaft oval-motion vibrating screens:

  • The vibration stroke length
  • The vibration angle
  • The vibration frequency

parameters can be easily changed according to the properties of the material to be screened. In other screens, it is not possible to change the vibration angle in particular. Yet changing the vibration angle according to the structure and grading of the material to be screened would make a great contribution to both capacity and screening efficiency. We also see this from Graph 14 STR, Graph 15 TIM and Graph 16 RPM graphs.

Figure 3 shows the change in stroke size and angle according to the properties of the material.

Figure 4 shows how the vibration frequency is changed.

Table TB2-1 shows the change in stroke length with the addition of cylindrical weights.

Figure 3. Change in stroke size and vibration angle according to material condition
Figure 3. Change in stroke size and vibration angle according to material condition

Figure 4. Changing the vibration frequency using a shim
Figure 4. Changing the vibration frequency using a shim

Table 1. Change in stroke length with the addition of cylindrical weights
Table 1. Change in stroke length with the addition of cylindrical weights

As a result, in a 3-shaft oval-motion vibrating screen, the controllability of the vibration parameters according to the material property increases the screen efficiency by 5–10% compared with other screens of the same size.

A Robust and Long-Lasting Structure

Thanks to the special bearing design, since the inner ring of the bearings stays fixed and the outer ring rotates, the loads are distributed over a wide area, which increases the bearing life. In addition, it has a very robust body structure.

As a result, good design and a robust body structure considerably increase the screen life.

Reasons for Preferring Circular-Motion Vibrating Screens

Despite all their disadvantages, circular-motion vibrating screens of the same size and number of decks have lower manufacturing, maintenance and operating costs. For this reason, they are preferred by many aggregate producers, especially in plants with relatively low capacities.

References

  • TEREX CEDARAPIDS TSH Horizontal ScreensForm 25524
  • TEREX CEDARAPIDS ElJay Legacy Series ScreensBulletin EJLS-1
  • Titreşimli Besleyiciler ve Titreşimli Elekler (Vibrating Feeders and Vibrating Screens)Suphi Yavuz, 2017, Gece Kitaplığı, ISBN 978-605-288-214-6
  • Technical Paper T-JCI-205Screen Capacity Paper by Larry Olsen & Bob Carnes


Suphi Yavuz

Senior Mechanical Engineer

Chamber of Mechanical Engineers registration no: 9219

MEKA GLOBAL

CONTACT YOU