This belt feeder design calculation follows the order of the calculation itself: the material a belt feeder suits, capacity with skirt width and belt speed, the resistances F1–F5, pulley tensions, and motor power.
For the other feeder types used in crushing and screening plants, see the feeder design and selection guide.
Belt feeders are generally used to feed materials of limited size stored in hoppers. Large and abrasive materials are not suitable for belt feeders, because these materials can easily damage the top cover of the feeder belt. The maximum material size for belt feeders is around 100 mm. The damage that abrasive, sharp-edged materials cause to the belt top cover can be offset to a certain extent by making the cover thicker.
Figure 1 shows typical MEKA belt feeder views.
Taking into account the parameters shown in Figure 2, the capacity is:
Q = 3600 · w · d · v · δ
Depending on the maximum lump size of the material being fed, the width w between the hopper skirts should not be less than the following values:
With h as the gate height at the hopper outlet:
d ≅ 0.75h ≅ 0.58w ∼ 0.75w
Belt feeder speed selection depends on the size distribution and abrasiveness of the material being fed and on the structure of the hopper feed zone. Depending on these properties, it can be selected between 0.08 m/s and 0.5 m/s. The 0.25–0.35 m/s range is the belt feeder speed range most commonly used in crushing and screening plants.
In belt feeders, the pulling force transmitted by the motor to the feeder belt through the drive pulley has to overcome the following resistances.
F1 = CfL (Q / (3.6 v))
The shear force that the active weight in the hopper exerts against belt movement:
F2 = 2000 μ0Lsw2δ
Resistance arising from the skirts acting on belt movement and from friction of the material against the skirts (parameters shown in Figure 2):
F3 = h · δ · ((1 − sin ∅) / (1 + sin ∅)) · μs · ((2.4w − h) · Le + h · Ls) + 9L
| Material | Angle of repose (°) | Friction coefficient between material and skirt, μs |
|---|---|---|
| Fly ash | 41 | 0.60 |
| Cement clinker | 44 | 0.55 |
| Portland cement, non-aerated | 37 | 0.45 |
| Bituminous coal | 36 | 0.49 |
| Bituminous coal, fines | 41 | 0.50 |
| Coke | 35 | 0.55 |
| Granite, black, −75 mm | 38 | 0.57 |
| River gravel | 37 | 0.48 |
| Iron ore, pellets | 36 | 0.55 |
| Lignite, dry | 37 | 0.55 |
| Limestone, crushed | 37 | 0.50 |
| Limestone, fines | 38 | 0.50 |
| Sand, dry | 37 | 0.48 |
| Wheat | 30 | 0.38 |
Table 1. Angle of repose and friction coefficients between material and skirt
The 9L term at the end of the formula indicates that a friction force of 4.5 daN/m is added per metre of rubber-lined skirt.
If the belt feeder is installed on an incline, the resistance arising from lifting the material:
F4 = w · h · δ · H
Resistance arising from belt cleaners and scrapers:
F5 = (nc·μc + ns·μs) · B
Thus the peripheral force that the drive system has to transmit to the drive pulley is:
F = F1 + F2 + F3 + F4 + F5
This force equals the difference between the tension T1 on the tight, carrying side of the belt wrapped around the drive pulley and the tension T2 on the non-carrying side.
F = T1 − T2
According to the Euler-Eytelwein formula (Figure 3), T1 and T2 are related by:
T1 / T2 = eμα
Here α is the wrap angle in radians and μ is the friction coefficient between the belt and the pulley. This coefficient is generally taken as 0.25 for bare pulleys and 0.35 for rubber-lagged pulleys. However, it is more appropriate to use Table 2 to determine this coefficient, because it varies widely, particularly with the operating conditions of the pulley.
K = 1 / (eμα − 1)
K is known as the friction factor. Hence:
T2 = KF
T1 = (K + 1)F
| Operating conditions | Pulley surface | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bare steel | Grooved polyurethane lagging | Grooved rubber lagging | Ceramic lagging | |
| Dry | 0.35–0.40 | 0.35–0.40 | 0.40–0.45 | 0.40–0.45 |
| Wet but clean | 0.10 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35–0.40 |
| Wet and dirty | 0.05–0.10 | 0.10 | 0.25–0.30 | 0.35 |
Table 2. Friction coefficients μ between belt and pulley
The motor power is:
P = Fv / (102 η)
For normal helical gear reducer drives, the mechanical efficiency is selected in the range 0.90–0.95. For worm gear units, selecting a mechanical efficiency in the range 0.60–0.70 will be more appropriate.
The maximum material size for belt feeders is around 100 mm. Belt feeders are generally used to feed materials of limited size stored in hoppers. Large and abrasive materials are not suitable for them, because these materials can easily damage the top cover of the feeder belt.
Large and abrasive materials are not suitable for belt feeders, because these materials can easily damage the top cover of the feeder belt. The damage that abrasive, sharp-edged materials cause to the belt top cover can be offset to a certain extent by making the cover thicker.
Depending on the maximum lump size bmax of the material being fed, the width w between the hopper skirts should not be less than 3.40 · bmax for low-abrasive material and limited hopper heights, 4.25 · bmax for low-abrasive material and large hopper heights, 4.50 · bmax for highly abrasive material and limited hopper heights, and 5.0 · bmax for highly abrasive and large hopper heights.
Belt feeder speed selection depends on the size distribution and abrasiveness of the material being fed and on the structure of the hopper feed zone. Depending on these properties, it can be selected between 0.08 m/s and 0.5 m/s. The 0.25–0.35 m/s range is the belt feeder speed range most commonly used in crushing and screening plants.
This coefficient is generally taken as 0.25 for bare pulleys and 0.35 for rubber-lagged pulleys. However, it is more appropriate to use Table 2 to determine it, because it varies widely, particularly with the operating conditions of the pulley.